doodlethoughts

Updated

WHAT THE RESEARCH FOUND

Counting
the thoughts.

Nobody can see a thought, but they can see one end.

For most of its history, research on thinking relied on people describing their own thoughts. A 2020 brain-scan study tried something new: instead of reading what people think, it spotted the moment they moved on to something else.

≈ 6,200 thoughts a day

Compare the methods
A person seen from behind sitting by a rain-streaked window, looking out at a city in soft evening light
AI-generated image, not a photograph of a real person or place.
  • Thoughts turn over all day
  • Pushing one away can backfire
  • Inner voices vary a lot
  • What the studies measured

THE SHORT ANSWER

Thousands a day,
and hard to steer.

One study counted when thoughts change.
Another showed what happens when we fight them.

THE COUNT

About 6,200 a day

Queen's University researchers estimated that the average person has about 6,200 thoughts per day, based on detecting when brain activity moves to a new pattern.

See the numbers

THE METHOD

Thought worms

They called runs of brain states focused on one idea thought worms. A new worm appeared right as new events began in films people watched.

Compare methods

THE WHITE BEAR

Try not to think of it

In a 1987 experiment, people told not to think of a white bear couldn't manage it, and thought about it more afterwards.

Why it backfires

HOW THOUGHTS ARE STUDIED

Three ways to
look inside a mind.

Pick a research method to see how it works. The bar shows how much it relies on people describing their own thoughts.

Method check

Choose a method
Sampling random momentsSelf-description

Descriptive Experience Sampling asks people for careful descriptions of their inner experience at randomly selected moments.

Thinking aloud with a bellSelf-report, out loud

In the white bear study, people spoke their stream of consciousness for 5 minutes and rang a bell whenever the forbidden thought appeared.

Brain scans while restingNo description needed

The thought worm method looks for when brain activity shifts to a new pattern, without asking what the thought was. The researchers say self-reports can be notoriously unreliable.

Sources: Hurlburt, Heavey and Kelsey (2013); Wegner et al. (1987); Tseng and Poppenk (2020), Nature Communications.

Summarised from the published studies listed in the sources.

TWO NUMBERS WORTH KNOWING

A busy mind,
measured in scans.

One estimate of how often thoughts change,
one on how many brains it came from.

≈ 6,200

Estimated thoughts a day, average person

The estimate comes from counting transitions between brain states. The researchers found the transition rate was stable across watching films and resting, and used it to approximate the rate at which thoughts turn over.

THOUGHTS PER DAY · QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY

184

People whose brain scans were analysed

The study used scans from 184 participants in the Human Connectome Project, recorded while they watched films and while they rested in the scanner.

THE DATA · NATURE COMMUNICATIONS

The researchers also related the resting transition rate to trait neuroticism, which they describe as a first neural confirmation of the 'mental noise' theory.

FOUR THINGS THE STUDIES SUGGEST

What the research
does and doesn't say.

These are findings from specific experiments, not rules for living. Each comes with the limits of the method behind it.

  • Thoughts change often

    The 6,200 figure counts changes of thought, detected indirectly, not words or sentences.

  • Suppression can rebound

    A 2001 meta-analysis of controlled studies found a small to moderate rebound after people tried to push a thought away.

  • A distraction helped

    In the second white bear experiment, people given a specific thought to use as a distracter were less preoccupied with the bear later.

  • Inner speech isn't universal

    Experience sampling found inner speaking in many, but not all, moments, with large differences between people.

A small white polar bear figurine on a wooden table beside an old brass desk bell
AI-generated image, not a photograph of a real person or place.
A researcher's hands at a desk with a monitor showing colourful abstract brain-scan images in a dim lab
AI-generated image, not a photograph of a real person or place.

THE WHITE BEAR

Why pushing a thought
away can backfire.

In Wegner and colleagues' 1987 experiment, people asked not to think of a white bear mentioned it and rang the bell anyway. When later told to think about the bear, they did so more than people who had been asked to think about it from the start.

A 2001 meta-analysis found the rebound effect was real but small to moderate, and varied with the kind of thought and how it was measured. People with clinical diagnoses did not show larger rebounds, though few studies included them.

Questions

Questions people ask

How many thoughts do we have a day?

One 2020 study estimated about 6,200 for the average person, by detecting when brain activity shifts to a new pattern. It is an estimate of thought transitions from scans, not a count of words.

What are thought worms?

The researchers' name for a run of adjacent brain states while a person stays on the same idea. When someone moves to a new thought, a new worm begins, and the method detects that change.

Does trying not to think about something work?

In the 1987 white bear study it backfired: people could not suppress the thought and thought about it more afterwards. A 2001 meta-analysis found a small to moderate rebound overall.

Does everyone hear an inner voice?

Not all the time. Descriptive Experience Sampling studies found inner speaking in many, though not all, sampled moments, and large differences between individuals in how often it happens.

Can a scan tell what I am thinking?

The thought worm method deliberately does not try. It detects when a new thought begins, without regard to what the thought is about.

References

  1. Queen's Gazette (2020): Discovery of 'thought worms' opens window to the mind
  2. Tseng and Poppenk (2020): Brain meta-state transitions demarcate thoughts, Nature Communications
  3. Wegner et al. (1987): Paradoxical effects of thought suppression (J. Personality and Social Psychology)
  4. Abramowitz, Tolin and Street (2001): Thought suppression, a meta-analysis (Clinical Psychology Review)
  5. Hurlburt, Heavey and Kelsey (2013): Toward a phenomenology of inner speaking (Consciousness and Cognition)

ABOUT THIS NAME

Interested in leasing doodlethoughts.com?

doodlethoughts.com is part of the DoodleSale portfolio. It isn't in an auction right now, but you can ask about leasing it.

Ask about this name